Is the big-bang theory necessarily true?
Shouldn’t we continue to question how the Universe began?
This site presents the idea of the Universe existing as a process of becoming.

Introduction to the big-bang theory
In 1929 Hubble observed that, regardless of in which direction we look, galaxies are moving away from us at speeds proportional to their distance from us. This observation, coupled with the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR or CMB) in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson, has led to the conclusion that the whole universe is expanding.

Reasoning backwards from this, many physicists and cosmologists have further concluded that the whole universe must have been contained in an infinitely curved, infinitely massive singularity that exploded in a big-bang that became the universe as we know it today. This is the big-bang theory.

While the two observations of expansion and cosmic background microwave radiation do strongly support the idea that the part of the universe we live in was smaller and much hotter than it is now, they would also be what was observed if the whole universe that is visible to us now was just the result of a very large super nova that took place in one tiny corner of an infinite universe.

Read on if you think we should all continue to question the physical origin of the universe and to ask why?


About this site To the links
"All is flux," Heraclitus To space-matters
Summary of the ontology of the universe as a process of becoming Who is Gerry O Nolan?
The Universe as a process of becoming